MISQ 2007
Note: Editorial statements are not peer reviewed. They are intended to address issues of interest to information systems researchers and senior executives and to serve as a forum for distributing editorial policy and announcing changes in the status of the journal.
MISQ 2006
MISQ 2005
Dec Reprise: The Parable of the Golf Balls
Sep The Grim Reaper: The Curse of E-Mail
Jun Some Implications of the Year-2000 Era, Dot-com Era, and Offshoring for Information Systems Pedagogy
Mar The Rhetoric of Positivism Versus Interpretivism: A Personal View
Dec The Reflexive Researcher
Sep Theoretically Speaking
Jun Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact
Mar The Problem of the Problem
MISQ 2002
Dec Some Futures of the Marketplace for Journals
Sep The Alliance
Jun Retrospection: The MIS Quarterly's Review Process: 1995-2001
Mar The Parable of the Golf Balls
MISQ 2001
MISQ 2000Dec Research in Information Systems: What We Haven't Learned
Sep What Are the Best MIS Programs in U.S. Business Schools?
Jun Information Systems Literacy and Responsibilities of Business Schools and Universities
Mar MIS Quarterly's Editorial Policies and Practices
Dec Irreducibly Sociological Dimensions in Research and Publishing
Sep The Social and Political Context of Doing Relevant Research
Jun Submitting a Manuscript for Publication: Some Advice and an Insider’s View
Mar Researchable Directions for ERP and Other New Information Technologies
Dec The Role of Information Technology in Reviewing and Publishing Manuscripts at MIS QuarterlySep The Timeliness of Publications in MIS Quarterly
Jun Strategizing for Compelling and Significant Research| Changes in the Editorial Board
Mar Overview| The MIS Field, the Publication Process, and the Future Course of MIS Quarterly| MIS Quarterly Departments, MISQ Discovery, and MISQ Review
This page is maintained by the MIS Quarterly, which can be reached at misq@umn.edu. It was last updated on October 16, 2007.