Abstract
This article discusses the conduct and evaluation of interpretive research in information systems. While the conventions for evaluating information systems case studies conducted according to the natural science model of social science are now widely accepted, this is not the case for interpretive field studies. A set of principles for the conduct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale. The usefulness of the principles is illustrated by evaluating three published interpretive field studies drawn from the IS research literature. The intention of the paper is to further reflection and debate on the important subject of grounding interpretive research methodology.
Keywords
- IS research methodologies
- interpretivist perspective
- critical perspective
- case study
- field study
- ethnography
- hermeneutics
ISRL Categories
- AI0102
- AI0108
- AI0112
- AI0116
- AI0802
- AI0803
- IB01
To order a copy of an article, click here.
Abstract from MIS Quarterly.
This page is maintained by Susan Scanlan, who can be reached at sscanlan@csom.umn.edu. It was last updated on June 24, 1999.